Vanzetti and Sacco are innocent of the Braintree murders. Automatically both men had the odds stacked against them because they were immigrants and they were anarchists. Allegedly the judge was biased although there was no proof of that affecting the case, and the prosecutor went out of their way to portray the defense in the worst way possible. The prosecutor brought up things in the past that had no relevance to the case. They brought up how Sacco and Vanzetti plotted to run to Mexico to avoid being drafted for the war. The prosecutor said how they were unpatriotic for this, giving the jury a negative impression on them. However, both men didn't make it easier for themselves. They followed the code of the street, meaning they wouldn't talk or “snitches get stitches”. They wouldn't give up a fellow comrade for their own benefit. That’s not how the jury saw it. To them, Sacco and Vanzetti were guilty. If they were innocent and had nothing to hide, they would talk was their philosophy. This bias against the two men made it hard for the jury to look at the evidence. For one, the gun found on Sacco on their arrest was a 32 mm while the gun used to kill the security guards was a 38 mm, even the serial number didn't match on both guns. The prosecutor introduced false evidence about the bullet used and it was later discovered that the police withheld evidence after the trial. The two men, however, were called guilty. When it was learned that the police withheld information and that they had an unfair trial, their case was opened again to be looked at by the same judge. An inmate held in a cell right next to Sacco and Vanzetti slipped them a note confessing that he was part of the Braintree Murders. He gave the police new information about the case that added up and hinted at another person who was involved. The other person was found and convicted by the police. His mugshot’s profile next to Sacco’s was fairly similar which could’ve explained the eyewitness's error. Despite this new discovery, the same judge, who was already biased against them, said they were still guilty and they were put on the electric chair. One of Vanzetti’s last few words was that he forgave the people who put him in that chair. Sacco and Vanzetti were charged for a crime they did not commit because of their background. They were an easy target to put the blame and were failed by the justice system.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Millenium Bug
The Y2K bug, or millenium bug, was a possible computer flaw that people feared would cause problems once the year hit 2000. Computer enginee...
-
The Bonus Army was a group of 43,000 people whom marched in the capital, Washington D.C.. The 17,000 World War I veterans and their familie...
-
In the time of 1999 and 2000, people were afraid of a coming apocalypse. The reason for this was partly because of the hysteria behind the ...
-
Named after president Hoover, the homeless or unemployed people during the Great Depression lived in Hoovervilles. These were small towns cr...
I believe that this case sheds light on the unfairness of the justice system at this time in American history. The justice system reflected the ideals of the American people very well - as it was shortly after World War I, many Americans had a strong nationalist mindset. In addition, many were unhappy with the high increase in immigration at this time. Sacco and Vanzetti were both immigrants and anarchists, so they were very easy for Americans in the 1920's to dislike. For this reason, they were unfairly convicted of a crime that they likely did not commit.
ReplyDelete